Rom wrote:the combination of price action & stochastic confirmer is generally a very accurate signal
Exactly, the weight of the apple is confirmed by size, and size is confirmed by weight. That makes it all very accurate

zilly wrote:Yes, the combination of price action & stochastic confirmer is generally a very accurate signal especially when the current fundamental themes add substance to the move.
Can't argue with price action when it sends alarm bells out as loud as those
That representation of indicator & price action is not only more than acceptable but actually quite powerful when utilized in tandem with qualified support/resistance zones & fundamental drivers.
A very good example of that was on USDCAD last week leading into the FOMC meeting transcript.
We often find the cleaner & better odds opportunities are to be unearthed away from the spotlight pairs such as Cable, EURUSD & USDJPY etc.
This pair has been very well supported above .9750 all the way through August, offering a positive leg up into bets seeking to puncture that 1.0000 parity level.
It's being shouldered by that 150 sma that zilly has referenced on a couple of his charts if you care to pop it up on your Daily chart for extra confirmation.
The stochastic hooking up off the 20 extreme reading on the Daily can then be counter referenced on the hourly chart, where entries can be confidently taken providing adequate risk is available & the available liquidity is primed at key market timezones, for instance during European/American business shifts.
Pullbacks, divergences, key levels such as round numbers/figures, s&r zones can be used as added incentive to leg into the bets & usually offer acceptable risk placements to tuck protective stops at.

