Hi Ron,
as I see it, there is still a lot to be done before you'll be able to make your system follow any desired risk:reward rule.
Having a strategy that was never designed around risk:reward ratio in the first place is one thing, adding that risk:reward rule afterward is another, totally different thing.
The problem is, you and me and other traders, we're all on the same boat: we cannot just wish for any strategy to follow our requirement of, say, 60 pips TP and 20 SL; some systems will never be able to adopt that.
I've tried to address this question here:
forex-risk-reward-folly-t114.htmlIn your particular case, we have an "unpredictable" system when it comes to taking profits: Moving averages, MACD, Stoch and many other indicators don't advise on future profit targets upfront. This immediately means that we cannot implement risk:reward ratio just by setting/choosing approximate or desired numbers.
When it comes to risk:reward, all numbers must be justified, e.g. setting a profit target of 100 pips for 1 min charts is unreasonable, same as setting a stop loss of 10 pips on daily charts. We know it from practice and experience. But then, why we allow guessing on other time frames? What would be a practical reason to believe that a profit target of 60 pips for EURUSD on hourly charts using certain entry method is a reasonable target? True answers can be found only after thorough evaluation, basically days and moths of dedicated testing. All trading strategies that cannot advise on profit targets upfront require such evaluation.
What strategies can advise on profit targets upfront?
These are: Support/resistance based strategies, channels, trend lines, pivot points, Fibonacci, Elliott etc - the fundamental pillars of technical analysis.
Regards,
Edward